Sep 30 2010

What I Learned Working Retail

First and foremost, and I think anyone who has worked in retail really agrees that the usual saying “Customer is Always Right” is absolute BULLSHIT.  I’m gonna try to keep this post short (and warn, I have a potty mouth when I’m pissed), but given I am now working at a new store since the other one closed, I’ve been out of work for two months before landing a job at a certain bedding and bath gifting shit store.  At my previous job, I did almost everything (except major decisions and deposits, other than that, kind of dealt with it even if only once in the near four years employed).  Every retail store has the usual crazy customers, rude customers, as well as nice customers.  But certain retail stores, I have to think, are getting worse.

Currently, “Customer is Always Right,” and you must drop whatever you’re doing, even if you’re told you’re on a strict timeframe, to help a customer, which 90% of the times are gonna say “Nah, just looking.”  I know when I go into a store, if I want help, I’ll ask.  It’s simple. There’s also this complete trust in customers versus employees.  Bag checks (found out, certain arts and crafts store does it too, yes, employees steal, do this, they’ll find a way to screw the company over more, or at least, they despise the company and end up not giving even more of a rat’s ass about doing their job).  It’s bad enough they may work 5 hrs and 59 min straight, now they may get patted down to check for contraband.

Adding on to “customers are the best” mantra, the magical return policy.  I think it’s a certain clothing store (I’m refusing to use names, but you may know what I’m talking about) has a disturbing return policy of allowing returns for everything (and other stores do it too, with used items, even pillows, (ew!)).  I, as a customer, refuse to shop and buy stuff from a place with a lenient return policy, simply because, depending on the type of item, it can be gross.  Most places probably discard washed merchandise, but what if, they don’t?  What if a kid with lice tried a pillow, and the mother returned it, not with a care in the world?  And the store accepted it and put it back?  I believe in a semi-strict policy, a certain number of days and must always have a receipt.  Maybe that’s just me.  Also, customers should know what fuckin size bed they have, got a Full but thought you needed a queen, wash the sheets and find out they don’t fit.  It’s not our fault you don’t know the size of your own damn bed.  We don’t sleep on it, you do.  Then you have the balls to return it.  It should be a no-can-do.  Check it on the bed before you wash it, at least.  Keep your fuckin’ receipt and keep the fuckin’ packaging.  If you have doubts, ALWAYS, keep everything.  I hate these new ways to check if someone bought something on a credit card, they should keep the receipt, we shouldn’t be expected to do everything.

There’s also what I have to think is actually breaking labor laws, when the only break is for those working at least 6 hours to get a 30-min lunch.  Meaning, work 5.5 hours, there isn’t even a 5-min break.

Most retail jobs, the hourly wages ones, are minimum wage or close to, have to deal with rude people, annoying people, assholes for bosses, be on their feet all day, walk from point A to point B constantly.  We work shitty hours (this week I had a close shift ’til 11pm then a first thing in the morning at 7:30am shift the next day), and are now, probably not even full time.  We’re the cheap able bodies on a floor, and are among the under appreciated, and I WANT OUT NOW!

I hate doing rant posts, but sometimes you got to let out a little steam.  Title may be a little misleading, I already knew this shit.

Sep 27 2010

New Fall Series 2010, What I’m Watching

Now that I finally got a chance to watch the premiere of The Event (I recorded it last week with Chuck b/c of work, but wanted to originally wait to see the 2nd week ratings, but had to watch since I’m off today and can watch it) and decided against Undercovers (I was interested in it initially, I mean, come on, it is JJ Abrams we’re talking about, but as the premiere got closer and the ads ran, it looked less and less interesting, and the ratings for it showed that others thought so too). I caught the pilot of No Ordinary Family, which doesn’t premiere until Tues, Sept. 28 at 8/7c when ABC allowed 5,000 people to stream it online. I caught Nikita, watched the first two eps actually, but, didn’t watch the third one. I watched the pilot for Hawaii Five-O last week online at cbs.com, but ended up not watching CBS’s new Thursday comedy Shit My Dad Says (I still refuse to use the symbols) and new Friday series Blue Bloods like originally planned, so I can’t say anything about those.

So, of the new series I caught, how do they stack up?

Well, obviously, because I no longer have a DVR, I find it a little difficult to just check out a new series, run the risk of actually liking it, and having to fit it into my schedule, which, though I work part-time, it’s still annoying. So several series I chose to not watch because they didn’t hold enough of my interest to begin with, they were more of a curious show, so that’s why I didn’t watch the new William Shatner (that and, I already had two shows I watch on Thurs. at 8, Vampire Diaries on the CW and FOX’s Bones), and despite wanting to check out Tom Selleck’s new series, I opted out to not have to record anything to DVD (let the damn thing rest) and watched Haven on Syfy instead. But, several shows I still HAD to watch, so let’s start with Monday:

Hawaii Five-O on Mondays, 10/9c PM on CBS, is a remake of the classic series. There were several key factors in my decision to continue as plan to watch the series (the next day online). One: Alex O’Loughlin. The guy can’t seem to catch a break. Moonlight, I still think, would’ve rebounded if CBS stuck with it and carried it into the vampire craze, but it got canned, as did his next series, also on CBS, the medical drama from last season, Three Rivers. Two: Len Wiseman directed (well, the pilot at least), and he also directed the first two movies of the Underworld franchise. Three: James Marsters is at least in the pilot, and given the character he played (the bad guy), looks like there could be more appearances? (see a pattern yet, kind of vampiric background in this show, don’t you think). Four: along with Marsters and O’Loughlin, two more stars of the genre line, Daniel Dae Kim, who was in Lost, and Grace Park of Battlestar Galactica fame. Five: Yes, this is a crime drama, but it is certainly a fun one, with a fantastic cast. Will I continue to watch? Based on the pilot, yes, I plan to watch, and recommend it if for some reason you don’t watch ABC’s Castle (which I do).  Oh, side note, anyone notice how William Sadler (Roswell, Bill and Ted’s Bogus Journey) played Steve McGarrett’s (O’Loughlin) father, well he also played Dr. Yablonski’s (O’Loughlin) uncle on Three Rivers. Interesting? Another great casting choice, although Steve’s dad gets killed.

The Event on Mondays 9/8c PM on NBC, is, well, a very interesting drama. Despite the mass advertising for this series, I still wasn’t turned off from watching it. Maybe it’s because all the trailers made me really want to know what “the Event” actually is, and the pilot, though may be a bit hard to follow, moved fast and, well, ended with a shitload of questions. Is this the next Lost? No, most certainly not, but with Heroes gone, a strange new series is what NBC needed, and the ratings were strong with the pilot, but I’m worried that it may be lost to some people. I really hope that those that watched it weren’t turned away, because, right now, this is about as close to a Lost replacement we got. Factors for me to watch the pilot: One: Jason Ritter, sometimes, it just takes an actor or two to make me watch a series, again, he hasn’t had a lot of luck with shows, having been in two past CBS series that bit the dust (though, the drama Joan of Arcadia did manage a 2nd season, while the comedy The Class died after one, which was a shame b/c that was hilarious), I just think that though this is a show with a large cast, he stands out. Two: Large cast and lots of complexity, it’s the Lost formula, it was what NBC had with Heroes, bring in a huge cast of knowns and unknowns, make sure to start a lot of questions (“What happened to Leila?,” “Who are the prisoners?”, “What happened to the plane?,” and the main one, “What is the Event?”, that’s just the pilot, and I may have missed a few), it brings in mystery and intrigue, which I like. Three: Cast is pretty huge, along with Ritter, there is also Laura Innes (ER), Zeljko Ivanek (who has been on True Blood, 24, Heroes, Damages), Scott Patterson (Gilmore Girls, Aliens in America), and Blair Underwrood (Dirty Sexy Money serving as the President of the US, along with a decent cast of relative unknowns. Four: Action, yep it’s got that too, plus the jumps from one scene to another kind of remind me of 24, making is suspenseful. Will I keep watching? I’m on the edge of my seat.

No Ordinary Family on Tuesdays at 8/7c PM on ABC, like I said, I caught the pilot online, so I don’t need to watch the premiere, but it runs like your typical intro pilot. Since this has yet to premiere on broadcast, I don’t want to say much, but there really isn’t much to give away, since the ads cover it well. A family with some problems crash and find themselves with superpowers. Yes, it’s a family with superpowers, and the powers they get come from what they need (to overcome weaknesses, basically). The father feels less masculine, now he has super strength, the mother is busy and doesn’t have time for much, now she has super speed, the daughter is a typical teenager who basically just wanted to snoop into peoples lives, now she’s telepathic, and the son sucks at math, now he’s a math wiz. As far as what made me watch it, One: Julie Benz, who played Darla on Buffy and Angel, and was more recent on Dexter (before her character bit the dust), she’s got the fan fare behind her, as does Michael Chiklis, who was in The Shield. That’s pretty much it, other than being sci-fi/fantasy. Will I keep watching? I’ll check the next episode to see how it goes, sci-fi/fantasy shows tend to need a few extra episodes before you can get into it, but it doesn’t overly scream WATCH, just yet.

Nikita on Thursday 8/7c PM on the CW, ah, this show I already stopped watching. I never watch La Femme Nikita, but this spy chick going rogue wanting to take down a secret gov. agency, and she’s got a spy on the inside, blah blah blah. I’m sorry, sure it’s got the kick-ass action and attitude, but I just don’t really care about any of the characters enough to even watch one more episode. I don’t miss it, and it’s something I can’t overly describe as to what the main problem is. It is an oddball on the CW, I agree they kind of need more shows like that. I wanted to watch it because, One: an action show on the CW is very rare, but for the most part, the series was hyped and looked like something I could watch. Will I watch more? Eh, nope.

Now to wait to see 2nd week ratings to see if whatever shows I do watch can make it. And then in a few months, I should have some midseason shows to look forward to, one of which is the Matthew Perry comedy Mr. Sunshine on ABC, and I’m very much looking forward to it.

Sep 24 2010

This Really Isn’t Rocket Science

November is not far from now, and this year’s mid-term election cycle, or whatever, has brought in a host of Republican Senate nominees with ideas that are so fucked up, I keep wondering, just how stupid would voters of Nevada (Angle), Kentucky (Paul), or Delaware (O’Donnell) would be if the Republican ends up winning the Senate seat for their state. They all agree on such radical ideas: women victims of rape should be forced to bear the rapist child should they become pregnant; privatize, well, everything, including what’s working such as Social Security and Medicare; and one thing that seems to be most uniform through all Republicans: no tax breaks for poorer people unless the rich have breaks too, despite the fact that they wipe their asses with hundred dollar bills.

If you make less than $250,000, which is a majority of this country, you’d benefit more with Democrats controlling the House and Senate, and in terms of the Senate, it’ll be better if Democrats could gain seats in order to be filibuster proof. Because, what the Republicans aren’t gonna admit: they purposely filibuster because they have to protect corporate interest, well, because, otherwise, they’ll lose those donations.

Let’s backtrack more. Think about this, Republicans run on moral high-grounds, sanctity of marriage and whatnot, yet have been caught with their pants down. These are the same ones that criticized Clinton. Honestly, I don’t care if politicians have affairs, it’s none of our business, but if they run campaigns on some “morality,” they should act so, meaning they should follow their own beliefs.

Furthermore, Republicans continue to think gay soldiers are bad. If there were more progressive Democrats in the Senate, ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ would’ve been no more. Plain and simple. McCain can say all the bullshit he wants that DADT doesn’t seek gay people in the military out, but the truth is, they have [Washington Post blog entry mentioning Mike Almy, a man who served 13 years before being discharged in 2006 after his PRIVATE emails were searched to find if he violated DADT]. They blocked a vote to move forward with repealing such a stupid law (along with the DREAM act); they have no problem removing talented people from the military because they (the Republicans) don’t agree with their sexual orientation.

Republicans being against gay marriage is another little ridiculous view. They claim it could harm regular marriage, but in reality, they are against it because they are homophobic; plain and simple. And, like with their hate towards stem cell research and abortion, most of it is stemmed because of their religious views, which means they are violating the Constitution.

Where did I get to that? In my views, religion should play no part in government. Any politician, whose political views stem with a religious view, is therefore, violating the Constitution’s freedom of Religion and Separation of Church and State policies that the Founding Fathers of this country established. There is no real reason behind banning gay marriage/abortions/gays in the military/stem cell research/etc. It’s just Republican bullshit. I will also note, yes, there are Democrats against gay marriage too (Obama himself has stated opposing gay marriage), but they at least propose a ‘compromise’ with civil unions, but to most, it’s not good enough.

Southern states are highly red states, and highly religious states. They have higher teen pregnancies, ’cause guess what? Most Republicans don’t approve of comprehensive sex education, along with being against Family Planning laws (which they argue their typical anti-abortion rants, but Family Planning is also about sex education, access to contraceptives, and the overall reproductive health of women).

Now, maybe as an Atheist, I tend to spot the worst of religion, but if it’s the only way for people to have morals, then I guess it serves some good (though, why can’t people be good for the sake of being good). I bring this up, because it happens that some Republican candidates would attack a Democratic candidate with religion. Remember, there are still people who think that Obama is a Muslim. And even if he was, why does it matter? Well, to them, the Republican/Conservative yahoos, well, they hate non-Christians, typically. You know, there are several states, that have it in their state constitutions that a politician can’t be without a god. But Democrats are more likely to hold the 1st Amendment, while Republicans care more about the 2nd one (probably, because they like to kill things, such as CIVIL RIGHTS).

So, if it is easy to pick one of the other, why did loonies (who the Republican Party weren’t endorsing, but the Tea Party were) become Republican nominees for this November’s election? And why could there be a chance they could win vs. a Democrat? The answer lies with the more extreme Republicans refusing to actually being interviewed by journalist in favor of have talks with friends in order to reach who they already have in their pocket in order to put more money in their pockets.

Great reads: Why the Tea Party Candidates are so Afraid of the Media – Huffington Post
Remembering the Dark Side of the Tea Party Movement – Don’t Tea on Me

Remember, if you think that the richest 2% should get tax breaks to create those invisible jobs by putting their savings into banks to rot instead of keeping breaks for middle class who would actually spend money which would help businesses afford hiring people, (meaning it’ll create jobs), then, I guess you are a loss cause, but if you agree that those 2% don’t need anymore breaks, then speak up and spread the word. Democrats need to hold all their seats this mid-term (and with the Senate, they really need to gain some), then we can say bye-bye to DADT; healthcare reform that passed can stay in place, but maybe it could extend what it should’ve had (public option, anyone?); The rich won’t get richer while the poor stay, well, exactly like they are, poor; cap and trade; better safety regulations; clean energy; net neutrality; these all have a better chance of surviving or being created with Democrats behind the wheel. It’s not Rocket Science folks.

Sep 19 2010

Snuggie Equals Dumb

Decided to go ahead and talk about what I think is one of the more annoying products advertised like crazy on the market. It’s been around for a while, but if you live in a bubble, here is the point to it: apparently there are people who have problems with regular blankets, that when reaching for something, their poor arms would have to be exposed in order to grab something. So, in comes the Snuggie, which to me, looks like a fleece night gown. Because it is a wearable blanket, more or less, it has arms, so your arms are never exposed. Now, maybe the way I put it makes it sound stupid…no, it’s pretty much a really dumb product. Save a few bucks, just get a goddamn blanket.

Oh, and what made me talk about this now? They have a new ad, to the tune of the “Macarena,” b/c we all want to remember such a low point in the 90s. And b/c no one should have to suffer through such a terrible ad, I’m not hunting it on YouTube and embedding it. If you want to ruin your eyesight and hearing, you can go to YouTube and search it. But, be warned: It’s stupid, plain and simple.

Sep 17 2010

Returning Shows to Watch

Many, many, many TV-related sites have all their ‘Returning TV’ lists as well as ‘New TV’ lists; an all in one guide to this fall TV season (I’ve done a ‘new series to watch list’ after the upfronts, in two parts: Part One (ABC/FOX/NBC), Part Two (CBS/CW), in case you’re interested). *Note, I have since decided not to watch a few, since it’s difficult to find time to watch all these shows (unless I got paid, which would be sweet, BTW, as retail sucks), also a few video clips appeared to have expired, I’ll update it when they premiere and I can review them further.

Back to what I’m getting at here.

I watch a ton of TV shows, I counted 19 shows returning this season (3 of which had already returned) just on the broadcast nets alone (ABC/FOX/CBS/NBC/CW). Monday is a big day, with 9-20-10 seeing the returns of How I Met Your Mother (CBS, 6th season), House (FOX, 7th), Chuck (NBC, 4th), in the 8pm hour alone. Of course, I love them all, but I push Chuck more, since Mondays are so blah, Chuck is the fun-fast action-spy-adventure that takes away the Monday blah. Plus, another reason to watch this season: Linda Hamilton (yo, it’s Sarah Connor, dudes), Eric Roberts (who was in Less Than Perfect with Zac Levi, and will be in the upcoming Syfy Sharktopus, and in The Expendables), Olivia Munn, Dolph Lungdren (you know, from Rocky IV, as well as this year’s The Expendables), Lou Ferrigno (The Hulk, dudes), Bronson Pinchot (remember, Balki Bartokomous), Isaiah Mustafa (Old Spice dude), Harry Dean Stanton (Alien), and Timothy Dalton (James Bond #4, I think), phew, that’s a lot of guest stars. Check out a 5 min look at Chuck:

And of course, ABC’s Castle (3rd) comes back that day as well, in the 10pm hour. Tuesday already saw the return of CW’s Life Unexpected (9pm, 2nd) and NBC’s Parenthood (10pm, 2nd), and on 9-21 will be the return of NCIS (8th) at 8pm on CBS (plus the spin-off series 2nd season, which I ended up stop watching). Wednesday, 9-22, is all about the return of ABC’s comedy lineup, including EMMY winning series for Best Comedy, Modern Family (9pm, 2nd), and at 9:30pm Cougar Town (2nd), which will feature guest Jennifer Aniston (cue Friends reunion), and on the serious side, CBS’s Criminal Minds (9pm, 6th) continues to be a powerful night, it’s one crime-procedural that continues to improve itself (like NCIS, this year it’ll have a spin-off series in the midseason). Thursday, we saw the return of CW’s hit The Vampire Diaries (8pm, 2nd), which I like watching, but admit there are lots of room for improvement (it’s not Buffy, that’s for damn sure), and on 9-23, FOX’s Thursday brings us the return of Bones (8pm, 6th) and Fringe (9pm, 3rd).

New paragraph, as September 24th, 2010 is the most important night in television, remember it. The CW has it’s most powerful night (sorry for using the word ‘powerful’ again), but it really is. 8pm start it off with the TENTH (yes, 10th) and FINAL season of one of the most beloved series from the WB era that transitioned to the CW (it’s 5 on WB and now 5 on CW, kind of like Stargate SG-1, which had 5 on Showtime and 5 on what was the Sci-Fi Channel (now Syfy). Smallville is monumental, because, knowing it’s the last, means they can pull out all the stops and close the series that’ll give it justice. Also, it will beat SG-1 in terms of having the most produced episodes for a sci-fi/fantasy series in the US (they’re still tied in terms of there being 10 seasons). And hey, Clark may (hopefully) now finally FLY. Actually, I believe they said they will finally do that, plus the teaser with the Superman suit (from Superman Returns). Check out this CW official video clip, highlighting Clark through the seasons, it’s just purely awesome:

And then at 9pm, the 6th season of the BEST TV SHOW, Supernatural (sorry for the shouting, it’s just all too exciting). Last season, was all about the impending apocalypse, now, with Sera Gamble now taking the helm as showrunner, it’ll be more about the monsters that go “bump in the night.” The premiere is set a year after the events of the 5th season finale. And thanks to TNT, next week, starting on the night of Sept. 23 at midnight and ending at 8pm the next day, a beautiful 20 hour Supernatural marathon. Catch a few, including the end of the 5th, and watch the premiere of season 6 on the CW at 9pm (might as well watch Smallville before it, the marathon does end at 8pm, so why not?). Check out this preview clip from the CW:

And then there is Sunday, which has FOX’s ‘Animation Domination,’ with the 22nd season premiere of The Simpsons, plus returns of Cleveland Show, Family Guy and American Dad.

Obviously, the series I like the most are highlighted by embedding video clips, but I also push FOX’s Thursday with Bones and Fringe as well as Criminal Minds on Wednesday, and just to pick one series on Tuesday, my favorite is Parenthood (Lauren Graham, come on Emmy people, recognize brilliance), and my fave Sunday is Family Guy, but I want to keep this post from getting too long. Too many video clips can be annoying.

And, remember, this is just broadcast, there are a few cable ones too, but I won’t get into that now.

Sep 01 2010

Weird TV Programming Afoot

[Please, excuse what is babbling on my part, I've had about a 3-4 hr nap in the last 24 hrs, yesterday evening actually, so I'm a bit tired]

I found out that Syfy has a bit of a weird programming issue. Originally I thought the new series Haven was gonna end its freshman season with a 2 parter on Sept 24 (starting at 9pm, against the premiere of the CW’s Supernatural.) I had already made my mind to watch the one true best TV show ever, Supernatural, and catch Syfy’s Haven in a late night encore. Turns out, Haven will be new through Oct. 8 and will remain in the 10PM timeslot. So, yay, I can still watch the CW (Smallville returns for a final season starting the 24th of September, leading into Supernatural‘s 6th season return), then flip and watch Haven. Then after Oct. 8th, I only have 2 shows to watch on Fridays. But the issue is, Smackdown starts on Oct. 1 and will be a new lead-in for Haven, with only 2 eps to go at that point. And the 2 eps before those will be on after, I believe, Warehouse 13 repeats, because its current lead-in, Eureka (another fantastic series), has its summer finale on Sept. 10th. This leaves a freshman series on its own for 2wks and then with a new lead-in (which, based on the wrestling show Syfy stupidly still airs, WWE NXT, which sees a little over a million viewers, it makes sense that Smackdown will be a poor lead-in). This means, the last 4 eps of Haven in the series will see a major ratings drop. I hope Syfy understands that enough that they’ll still renew it and consider keeping it paired with Eureka in some way. What I don’t get, is if Warehouse 13 only got a 13 episode renewal, why not have had it paired so they would’ve been new together and there wouldn’t have been some lead-in change up toward the end of Haven and Eureka could’ve been on Tuesdays before WWE NXT, but I’m just a viewer, what do I really know about programming.

So, really, this post is my way of advertising a pretty good series Syfy has now, Haven, that now looks to stand a possible cancellation if that ratings drop occurs b/c of their great programming. I like it better than Warehouse 13, Stargate Universe, and Caprica.

Speaking of Caprica, remember it debut its 1st season back in January of this year, ran through, I think, March for its spring finale. Well, it was supposed to have returned in the fall, but Syfy felt it necessary to damage its ratings more by not airing the 2nd half of its still 1st season until, well, January. 9 months between episodes is a LONG time. Only premiums can really get away with that. I still stand by that the 9-10 month hiatus ABC had for Pushing Daisies b/c they failed to order post-strike episodes to keep some episode flowing in April and May of that 2007-2008 season, is what killed its ratings enough to cancel it. As well as NBC doing the same thing to Chuck which caused what was a no-brainer renewal for it in its 1st season to on-the-bubble status since. Luckily, NBC had ratings fails with Heroes and others that Chuck managed to make it to a 4th season.

And Syfy isn’t the only cable net doing weird things with a freshman series. Because White Collar has a 16 episode 2nd season, it’ll be split, so it’s summer finale airs on Sept. 7th, while Covert Affairs will still be on for another week, with a 2-hr finale (it had an 11 episode order, apparently) on Sept 14 (so it’ll be on at 9PM). Now, Covert Affairs has the luxury to have built on its White Collar lead-in, seeing about a million more viewers actually. So, it’s not in trouble, but it could still see a hit if a good portion of those viewers watched because it was on after White Collar. Another thing, this 2-episodes on the 14th puts it in the 9pm hour where CW will premiere Life Unexpected (yes, I do like watching that, shut up). Not to mention the fact that Warehouse 13 will also still be new. Not that those two shows could dent Affairs, its just, it makes my TV schedule crazier than it already is.

But probably the one that annoys me, and this affects Eureka and True Blood (I know, completely different shows). Labor Day Weekend. Syfy and HBO aren’t showing new episodes, so that makes 1 week between the penultimate episode and the finale (in Eureka‘s case, a midseason finale, but the rule still applies). I don’t like a week in between the last two eps of a season (or midseason, whatever). It’s ANNOYING. And it was exactly the same last year on HBO, so start True Blood a week earlier next year, so the finale occurs before Labor Day Weekend (then you can have a marathon of the whole season or something, during). Also, it would make there be 4 new episodes in the beginning of the season before the 4th of July Weekend (another weekend without new eps), instead of just 3.


EDIT 9/14/10 – it’s getting weirder, Syfy has decided to bring Caprica back a little sooner (Oct 5 at 10pm) pushing the return of Sanctuary to Friday Oct 15 at 10pm. So those of us looking forward to a new season of Sanctuary have to wait a little longer, while Caprica fans who were already aware of a January premiere, get it sooner? (wouldn’t it have made sense for Caprica to take the Friday 10pm spot. Afterward, Syfy tweeted that it’s a good thing for Sanctuary fans, then they can promote it longer. They barely promote it now, but it didn’t take long to promote the quick return of Caprica, just a note.

WordPress Themes

Bad Behavior has blocked 205 access attempts in the last 7 days.

Bear